Anna Freud: Part 1 – ‘Her secret failure’

By Robert Whiston FRSA, Sept 2009

Anna Freud’s - 80th Birthday - Photo by Larry Wangh, Ph.D - Anna Freud's contributions to the literature of child care, written in collaboration with Dorothy Burlingham and others, revolutionised the judicial approach to custody.

Anna Freud’s – 80th Birthday – Photo by Larry Wangh, Ph.D – Anna Freud’s contributions to the literature of child care, written in collaboration with Dorothy Burlingham and others, revolutionised the judicial approach to custody.

Anna Freud is arguably best known for two assets, one being the daughter of Sigmund Freud and secondly the author of a book whose title has like no other passed into a legal mantra.

With the death of her father, Sigmund in 1939, she inherited his mantle as acknowledged leader of the psycho-analytic world movement and the influence it commanded.

The book is, of course, in “Beyond the Best Interest of the Child” which was written in 1973 with co-authors Solnit and Goldstein. [1] This was followed by two other books “Before the Best Interests of the Child” (1979), and “In the Best Interests of the Child (1986).

All three books were highly influential during the 1970’s and 1980s which was a period when custody laws were being revised. Her pre-existing high profile in the psycho-analysis sphere meant that her books had a hitherto unimagined influence over almost half the population of Britain – fathers.

But how many realise that her fame and legendary status is premised on a failure ?

Miss Dorothy Burlingham-Tiffany, a life long close relationship, friend and associate of Miss Anna Freud - Photos by Larry Wangh, Ph.D

Miss Dorothy Burlingham-Tiffany, a life long close relationship, friend and associate of Miss Anna Freud – Photos by Larry Wangh, Ph.D

It was in 1925 that Anna Freud met Dorothy Burlingham-Tiffany (b 1891, d 1979), the daughter of the American millionaire family, Tiffany. [2] She had recently divorced her husband and had journeyed to Vienna to seek Freud’s psycho-analytical skills for her four children (two boys and two girls). [3] Burlingham was convinced one or more of her children were suffering from depression and or psychosomatic illnesses. The psycho-analysis and treatment was continued in London when the Freuds fled Austria in 1938 to avoid Nazi persecution.

For the next 40 years Burlingham’s four children were effectively Anna Freud’s guinea pigs but the world would not know for many decades that her treatment of the Burlingham children was an utter disaster.

The measure of its lethality can be gauged by the alcoholism and overdoses it induced and the deliberate suicide of one of the children, ‘Mabbie’, in Anna Freud’s own home in 1974. [4] Exactly what went on during the sessions of analysis with the children remains unclear and we shall probably never know. [5]

We do know from a BBC documentary that both Anna Freud and Dorothy Burlingham were concerned that the eldest son, Robert Burlingham, Jr. would develop into a homosexual. Robert, later to become a cello player, architect and city planner, reportedly committed suicide in 1970 aged just 55. [6] Whether this was related to depression or the unsuccessful and unremitting treatment Robert received is open to speculation.

What is beyond question is that Robert Burlingham Jnr. never saw his child John Michael Burlingham, who alternatingly spent his youth in London with his grandmother, Dorothy, or at school and college in America. He appears never to have seen or worried about his father, Robert Burlingham Jnr. But what is also beyond dispute is that John Michael recounts in his book how the actual death of his father left him with a void and a sudden sense of hollowness that he was powerless to fill. [7]

It is a paradox that Freud and Burlingham should have obsessed about Robert’s perceived propensity towards homosexual tendencies, given that their sexual orientation appears anything but heterosexual.

Anna Freud and Dorothy Burlingham are variously described as ‘close and intimate’ friends; and having a deep and abiding friendship; being lifelong friends; living together; life partners; lifelong companions; or even ‘partners’. [8]

In the modern vernacular we have to conclude they were lesbians – as were not a few of the early Suffragettes.[9]

Blissfully unaware of the protracted nature of this core experiment’s disaster (which was kept a closely guarded secret for over 30 years), academia and the judiciary began embracing the theories on the basis it was were fully tested and functional.

Anna Freud and the school of thought that gathered around her maintained that any post–divorce contact between parents was inherently confrontational, dangerous and/or violent. Awarding sole custody to mothers achieved the twin ambitions of limiting a father’s access to his children and restricting any dangerous confrontational scenes with his former wife.

This view was in evidence in the life of Robert Burlingham, Jr. and in Freud’s wartime work with children affected by the Blitz (Hampstead Nurseries).

The lingering question has to be why was Anna Freud was so opposed to fathers participating in their children’s lives ?

Research from the 1930s had already shown that households without a father had pathologies unknown to normal families. American film of the time spoke of “juvenile delinquents”, a term new to English audiences.

Even Quaker Joseph Rowntree (born 1834), [10] and William Booth (born 1829), who founded the Salvation Army could see fundamental difference between intact and fatherless families.

At a time when Roman & Haddad, were arguing in ‘The Disposable Parent’ (1978), that joint residence was the best post-divorce arrangement and that courts should begin with a rebuttable presumption of joint residence, Anna Freud’s uniquely influential position undermined them. Her books (1973 – 1986), beginning with ‘Beyond the Best Interest of the Child’ effectively cut the ground from underneath those who saw fathers as an asset in post-divorce families.

The trend in Britain of joint custody [11] that had been growing unseen during the 1970s and 1980s was only terminated by Act of parliament in 1991. [12]

END

References

[1] Alber J. Solnit, and Joseph Goldstein

[2] Tiffany jewellery, luxury goods and perfumes.

[3] Robert Jnr and Michael, the two girls Mary and Katrina were nicknamed Mabbie and Tinky respectively

[4] BBC documentary ‘The Century of Self’ http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcfour/documentaries/features/century_of_the_self.shtml

[5] ‘Did Anna Freud’s teaching help make Marilyn suicidal?’, by Claudia Joseph, 24 March 2002 . It also suggests that Freud’s theories contributed to the death of Tiffany heiress Mabbie Burlingham who took an overdose in Freud’s London home.“ http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/did-anna-freuds-teaching-help-make-marilyn-suicidal-655202.html

[6] See BBC documentary ‘The Century of Self’ http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcfour/documentaries/features/century_of_the_self.shtml

[7] “Behind Glass: A Biography of Dorothy Tiffany Burlingham”, by John Michael Burlingham,

[8] See http://www.glbtq.com/social-sciences/freud_a.html The Independent, The Guardian etc

[9] “The Ascent of Woman: A History of the Suffragette Movement”, Melanier Phillips, 2003.

[10] In 1863 he produced a statistical study on the links between crime and poverty. Two years later he published a second study, ‘Pauperism in England and Wales’. See also ‘Poverty, A Study of Town Life’, and ‘The Temperance Problem and Social Reform’ (1900),

[11] See ‘Twenty Wasted Years’ R Whiston http://robertwhiston.wordpress.com/2008/02/05/5/ and http://robertwhiston.wordpress.com/2008/10/12/12/

[12] Children Act 1989, enacted 1991.

Advertisements

4 responses to “Anna Freud: Part 1 – ‘Her secret failure’

  1. Hey there would you mind sharing which blog platform you’re using? I’m going
    to start my own blog in the near future but I’m having a difficult time deciding between BlogEngine/Wordpress/B2evolution and Drupal. The reason I ask is because your design and style seems different then most blogs and I’m looking for something
    unique. P.S Sorry for getting off-topic but I had to ask!

  2. I use WordPress and since I am no techie, I find it straightforward. You can alter the appearance of your blogs quite easily as you will see fom the variety of blogs under my name, should you care to search.

  3. Hi.
    I have been reading your weblog for some time now and finally got the bravery
    to go ahead and give you a shout out! Just wanted to tell
    you keep up the excellent job!

    • Thanks Brent, write more often – its appreciated ! !
      Its always good to hear from readers. One sometimes wonders whether people read the various articles or simply skate over them. What takes you interest most as I have several sites on different topics ?

      RW

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s